Endangered wildlife- Should corporations take the lead in protecting wildlife?

Endangered wildlife- Should corporations take the lead in protecting wildlife?

Introduction

Wildlife conservation is common to talk in every country. Every person, young and old is talking about it. Perhaps it is because people love animals although some fear certain category of them. However, there are far much more reasons why wildlife conservation should be a talk of the day. Most people are not aware of the other advantages which human leap from the wildlife. It might be the reason as to why, although people want and are trying to conserve wildlife, the efforts remain very low. Also, the methods people and some governments are using to conserve the wildlife are making the situation worse. This paper analyzes the importance of wildlife and the reasons why wildlife conservation is still below the standards, to suggest that corporations should take the lead in protecting them.

Importance of wildlife

One and the most common significance of wildlife is a tourist attraction. Wildlife creates an exciting appearance to people. People enjoy watching behaviors of animals and plants in their natural environment. They create a place to spend leisure time.  Most countries are depending on the revenue generated from tourism as a result of wildlife. The unique wildlife a state has the higher the number of tourists. For example, a wild cat or the tiger is not common in the most country, but India has it. Borneo has the endangered proboscis monkeys and several species of hornbills among others(Peiró-Signes et al., 2015). People are using wildlife photographs and videos to make documentaries which are earning them revenue. The  US, to justify the advantage wildlife to a country collected a total of $334M from wildlife tourism in 2015(Peiró-Signes et al., 2015). The advantage of wildlife to a state validates the need for conservation.

The most important advantage of wildlife to human is the provision of stability to natural processes. Natural processes are those which human beings cannot be able to control like rainfall and temperature. Using rain as one of the benefits of wildlife, plants are essential in ensuring that there is rainfall in a given area. A scientist has gone ahead and established how trees attract rain through Due to bionic pump. Animals on the other are associated with regulation of heat through a process known as heat evolution(Feilen & Marshall, 2017). The wildlife animals and plants are also sources of nutrients for the soil. They benefit human being by providing fertile ground for growing food crops. Some cultures and even scientist have identified certain plants with medicinal value. The animals are also sources of food to some cultures. The many advantages of wildlife have created a need to conserve the natural environment.

Why it is below standard/ challenge in conserving wildlife

Involvement of government and individuals in conserving the environment yield minimal advantages because of the selfish nature, corruption and the advantages of wildlife. People and the society know the need and benefit of the wildlife and therefore talk of conservation. However, they conserve and destroy it as they leap from the benefits. Taking an example of tress, people are aware that through them, they get rainfall but some go ahead in cutting them for fuel. Most cultures and people depend on wildlife for food, clothing and even medicine. Although there are other ways they can generate food without destroying or depending on wild animals, people are reluctant in employing other means. They argue that they are the ones conserving the environment and therefore they need to benefit directly. It is easy to replace trees they have used but not easy for animals. Some wild animals have become extinct because of poaching for skin, meat, and other advantages.  American Bison and some species of whales became extinct because of overhunting them (Feilen, & Marshall,  2017). It is not easy to replace them as there are no seeds like plants.

Various governments are also involved in cutting down of trees and natural forests with claims that they will plant again just because they have powers. However, they end up destroying even the few species of vegetables which they do not work to generate more with the remaining but plant other different species(Peiró-Signes et al., 2015). Sometimes corrupt members from the government also cut down trees without replanting because the government can not investigate them. They deforest with a mind to conserve by replanting the vegetables, but during replacement, they do not restore the forest in its original form.

People and governments respond to environmental conservation in reactive ways and without sufficient knowledge which makes the situation even worse. Governments wait until they get reports that their countries are experiencing low rainfall to start taking quick unplanned measure to restore forests.  The measures include clearing bushes to have an organized land where they can plant trees. However, clearing of the bushes destroys homes for many species of animals and plants (Hayward, & Marlow, 2014). Wild animals die because of the destruction of their habitats. People also clear bushes and plant organized tress thinking that they are conserving the wildlife while they are destroying the natural trees which take hundreds of years to grow. In some instances, the government also fences forests and wildlife areas as a way of conserving and protecting the animals by preventing poachers from accessing the areas. However, the method is not friendly to some of the wild animal species which need to keep on moving from one habitat to another as the weather changes like the wild beast or for bleeding like the hippopotamus(Peiró-Signes et al., 2015). They end up dying or failing to reproduce.

Most people believe that taking the endangered species from their natural resources and keeping them in a caged place is strategy and the best method to conserve them. Most of the animals do not survive because the environment is not conducive for their survival(Hayward, & Marlow, 2014).   Another reason which has made the process of conserving wildlife faulty is the failure to understand the deeper and the most important advantage of the wildlife. The government does not take seriously that with the wildlife, a country can become more productive through enhancement of good climate.

Government and individual initiatives to conserving the environment are faulty because they do not pay much attention to the issue. Wildlife conservation is a field which requires a scientific approach to identify the best methods of approaching the natural environment(Peiró-Signes et al., 2015). The government and people do not use those methods due to ignorance and lack of necessary skills. Also, governments and societies are always the first to break laws they set to conserve the wildlife. Due to the failures of the two parties, an independent body, corporation, is need to solve the problems discussed.

Why we need corporations

Using corporations to conserve the wildlife will allow application of proper analyzed and tested methods which will not harm the animals and plants more. Corporations are more serious with what they do, and they try their level to use the best way which can give good results. In wildlife conservation, corporations know that they are responsible for anything that will happen to animals and therefore, they will be keener on the practices they carry out in conserving the animals. Having that idea of responsibility, they will have to carry out scientific research to come up with proper ways of handling the animals and plants without destroying any of the species(Hayward, & Marlow, 2014). It means that they will be able to solve the society and government problem of destroying more when they are trying to conserve

The law enables corporations to contract professionals in their activities. Unlike the government which uses police officers and other citizens who are not qualified to take care of the wildlife, corporations will be able to employ experts. The advantage will solve the issue of alteration of natural habitats while trying to protect it from poachers(Hayward, & Marlow, 2014). With professionals from the field of wildlife, they will be able to ensure that natural habitats are not interfered with while constructing structures. Also, corporations are able and employ professional managers in different departments to enhance outcomes. Most of the conservation programs fail because of poor management from the government since the ministers in charge lack the basics of control and they only work through politicizing of issues managers in corporations will be able to make them remain focused to wildlife conservation.

Corporations, because of the seriousness they put in their activities and close management, they can be able to borrow funds as they are allowed by law to finance conservation programs. Unlike the government which may neglect or allocate meager resources to the department, corporations will be able to push for more and even borrow to serve the deficit. It, therefore, means that there will be enough resources to carry out conservation activities. Corruption from the government and ignorance of the department leads to the substandard conservation program. Government bureaucracy does not allow quick responses to wildlife disasters like wildfire and pouching(Hayward, & Marlow, 2014). However, because of the close monitoring of corporations, it is easy to respond to such issues which may save the wildlife.

Corporations also have the power to sue. Since they are independent entities, it is easy to handle prominent people and those who are in the government. In most cases, government officials are the ones who paralyze wildlife conservation programs to benefit(Hayward, & Marlow, 2014). Some ensure that the department does not work to get contracts for their companies to conserve a forest or a game reserve. Other officials approach those in charge of the conservancies and demand for a share of land since they know that they are immune to the law. With corporations, it is easy to deal with such persons through court processes. Corporations, unlike the government, will be able to concentrate on their objective to conserve the wildlife because that is the only business. The directors will be able to have regular meetings to enquire for progress or about specific issues arising and therefore make the conservation programs effective. Corporations have a functional structure of management to support wildlife conservation. They are separate entities without any link with anybody who would interfere with their roles making them fail in the duty and therefore, they should be allowed to take the lead in wildlife conservation.

References

Feilen, K., & Marshall, A. (2017). Multiple Ecological Factors Influence the Location of Proboscis Monkey ( Nasalis larvatus) Sleeping Sites in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology, 38(3), 448–465.

Peiró-Signes, A., Segarra-Oña, M. D. V., Miret-Pastor, L., & Verma, R. (2015). The effect of tourism clusters on US hotel performance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly56(2), 155-167.

Hayward, M. W., & Marlow, N. (2014). Will dingoes really conserve wildlife and can our methods tell?. Journal of Applied Ecology51(4), 835-838.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?