Summary

In my initial project, I chose a plan in healthcare that emphasis on creating strong affiliations between the patients themselves, patient-nurse relations and nurse-nurse relations. Establishment of a healthy connection program is more of a mentoring, monitoring and measurement program with a primary focus of increasing service delivery in our healthcare institutions. Up to date, it closes up to two years since the kick off of my project (Riley, 2015). In this proposal, it helps in empowering particular individuals with disabilities to let them comprehend the basis of their respective health urgencies. They could succeed at this through familiarising with the community resources and the interconnection with their peers within the community set up. Currently, I have two groups to study, one locating in Brooklyn while the other in Los Angeles.

The project’s setting involves newly-introduced elementary schools in the respective precincts as already mentioned above. As a result of minor drawbacks in the initial plan, Clinton Ferron, my sponsor as well as a Chief Medical Servant in Brooklyn, call in for the refurbishment of the initial idea (Stein-Parbury, 2017). It is a bad choice for individuals with cognitive challenges to shy away from seeking medical interventions whenever the need arises. It is the reason as to why Clinton finds it rightful for both the healthcare sector and the society to establish promising safeguards for these particular individuals.

As an example of an inpatient advocacy program, it involves many gatherings with the participants, from which a small majority happens to be taking medicine courses. At this phase, I find it imperative to determine if this project is indeed accomplishing its first prospects (Gault, 2016). Hence, this study presents itself as a compelling point of reference in the determination of health disparities among the disabled in a community set up.

Goals/Objectives

1. To evaluate the influence of an individual and team mentoring interventions of health advancements. In particular, the project aims at assessing the quality of life of a school going children (Stein-Parbury, 2017). It includes both the motor and intellectual disabilities that contribute much to the challenge.
2. To undertake a preliminary study to evaluate the influence of an inpatient advocacy exercise towards the lessening of health disparities for both the in-patients and out-patients. These individuals as already mentioned-above mainly consist of the disabled who are not in a position to either comprehend or express their desires and necessities in healthcare.
3. I will be evaluating the hypothesis that through the use of a patient advocacy program in leveraging the patient health fit connections (Stein-Parbury, 2017). As a resultant end, there should be a limitation in medical errors, an upsurge inpatient fulfilment and an overall reduction of the health disparities among the disable populace.

Milestones/Deliverables

In the project, dependency affiliations take consideration as a chief milestone in the course of the process. It involves drafting of the project’s fundamentals to certify a pact between myself and the relative stakeholders. As a chief milestone, it contributes to the project’s success by continually reminding the stakeholders and the participants on their respective roles in the project. It is a beneficial deliverable as it clearly defines the proposal’s proof of concept, the structural design, establishment, analysis up to the launching phase. One thing about stakeholders is their positive attitude towards the finalisation of a select phase of a project or the completion of the project as a whole.

Purpose becomes our next milestone. Close to every project, there is a comprehensive operational plan that delineates particular actions and phases of a project. Through the selection of specific aspects, it is highly probable for the entire team to uphold the effective progression of the project, until its completion phase (Stein-Parbury, 2017). Purpose presents itself as a milestone that reminds one of the planned completion dates of the particular project. Still, it provides for the opportunity for an individual to gradually keep the project on toes with every undertaking.

Identification becomes our last milestone, through its capability to recognise every kickoff and summary of tasks. It stages as a beneficial milestone for the establishment of tracking mechanisms that delineates how far the project stands (Riley, 2015). I happen to consider the use of a software-development strategy, that encompasses the; initiation stage of the project, establishment analysis and putting to work the plan.

Timeline and Key Tasks

Presently, it marks two years since the project’s inception. It is in its finalisation stage, with prospects signalling about eight months to go. It thus makes the project to last for two years and eight months. In the entire project, even though involving, I must give a round of applause to the pure nature of my timeline. First, I have to make sure that at least once in every month, I come to meet with the participants, my chance to determine the effectiveness of the ongoing patient advocacy programs (Eggins, 2016). It follows with the collection of information from every participant for purposes of analysis. I understand that the process necessitates for data collecting equipment including video taking using cameras, note-taking, use of questionnaires and the one-on-one interview with the health practitioners and the participants as well.

Cost Estimates

Broadly; the project seems to be cost effective due to the free participation and the involvement of the health staff who expects to succeed at mentoring, supervising and evaluating of the projects’ influences. It involves making sure that every phase of the project meets its deadline (Gault, 2016). By thoughtful consideration of every step of the plan, it becomes simpler to pre-determine how long it would take to fulfil every stage of the project. The project uses a bottom-up estimation technique in the cost estimations. The method is known to leverage cost rates of particular resources. It includes the accumulation of each person’s estimates, from the work they accomplish. Hence, project costs such as indirect and direct costs take considerations in the estimation. The work break down structure is effective due to its inclusion of every undertaking during the project’s course.

In the project, it neccesitates for three communication experts; a project supervisor, a user experience expert and nursing practitioner. The wage rates for these individuals are:

1. Project Supervisor – $80/hour
2. User Experience Expert – $70/hour

• Nursing Practitioner – $80/hour

It means, the proposal neccessitates for Project Supervisors for averagely 80 hours, the user experience experts for 70 hours and the Nursing Practitioner for 80 hours. It thus results to the below-mentioned costs:

1. Project Supervisors: $80/hour * 80 hours * 3 = $19,200
2. User Experience Expert: $70/hour * 70 hours * 3 = $14,700
3. Nursing Practitioner: $80/hour * 80 hours * 3 = $19,200

Therefore the entire cost estimates is:

($19,200 + $14,700 + $19,200)

= $53,100.

Key staffing/Non-staffing resources needed

In the project, we understand that an essential technique to staffing involves patience until the project ascertains the availability of funds to justify recruitment of either a part-time or full-time staff. Since the project is continuing, it is ideal to consider necessary staffing including full-time bookkeepers, IT specialists and communication expert. In the project, it consists of both required staffing and non-staffing resources. Other key staffing resources in the project include the individuals who function as mentors towards this group, those who exercise analysis and interpretation of the data. Nurses and healthcare givers also symbolise themselves as being key Staffing influence

Unlike critical staffing essentials, the project also considers the involvement of non-staffing resources (Ekkins, 2016). In our case, we understand the importance of entertainment in every meeting. It thus means,  the resources falling under non-staffing includeentertainment equipment, questionnaires, food and beverages and various recreational services.

Conclusions

As a final presentation of our proposal, this paper offers good commendations on as to why our healthcare institutions need to be wary of the factors hindering effective health provision among the disabled. Hence, I find it imperative for the healthcare institutions to initiate this proposal, as its prospects to bridge the gap in communication between this particular group and the nursing practitioners.

References

Eggins, S., In Slade, D., & In Geddes, F. (2016). Effective communication in clinical handover: From research to practice.

Gault, I. (2016). Communication in nursing and healthcare: A guide for compassionate practice. Sage Publications Ltd.

Riley, J. B. (2015). Communication in Nursing – E-Book.

Stein-Parbury, J. (2017). Patient and Person: Interpersonal Skills in Nursing.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?