How can terrorism be deterred? Fighting Terrorism

How can terrorism be deterred? Fighting Terrorism

How can terrorism be deterred? With violence! This answer seems to be right because terrorism has a connotation of evil, indiscriminate violence, or brutality. Nonetheless, if we are talking about fighting terrorism, we are talking about fighting terrorism by force. For most of the previous twenty-five years, US policy increasingly has been captured by three related refrains regarding the post-Cold War era: 1) nuclear terrorism was the remaining greatest threat; 2) nonproliferation was the highest priority and key to countering this greatest threat; and, 3) in turn, US nuclear reductions and limitations were the key to nonproliferation. The policy direction that followed these three refrains regarding US nuclear weapons was that their salience and numbers should be lowered, both for their lack of value and to advance our highest nuclear policy priority, nonproliferation. The postulates underlying these lines were and are questionable at best, but taken together they led inevitably to the conclusion that nuclear deterrence was an old subject and strategy, and US nuclear forces were of greatly-declining value and interest. The security policy of the USA is the prime but not the only example. Underlying all these measures is the contemporary concept of deterrence, based on warding off the threat of (global) terrorism with enormous military power and strength. In contrast to the Cold War, when deterrence meant the credible threat of retaliation in case of an attack, it now encompasses the risk of preemptive self-defense.

It has often been said that the times we live in are more dangerous and unpredictable, paradoxical as it may seem, than the world of the Cold War when the balance of nuclear terror imposed a specific brutal order on world affairs. In that regard, the development by the Bush administration of a new strategic doctrine that moves away from the Cold War pillars of containment and deterrence toward a policy that supports pre-emptive attacks against terrorists and hostile states with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons is particularly important.Speaking at West Point’s commencement on June 1st, President Bush spelled out his rationale for a possible attack on Iraq, but also a doctrine that has far-reaching implications for the international rule of law. Bush quoted that it would take a long time to wait for the terrorist activities to matreialize. He also added that it was the responsibility of the American citizens to protect their lives from terrorism and the State should enforce its security to control terrorism.

During the 9/11 terror attack in the United States, nearly 3000 people succumbed from the catastrophic attack. This was a clear indicator of power countries’ vulnerability to terror attacks. BesidesBesides, it was a belief that such countries could be having a high-tech security system that would be able to protectprotect the country from terrorism.  A phenomenon is knownis known as an asymmetric warfare evaluates on how power nations could be prone to attacks by a less powerful state, with the former’s assumption of preparation for a terror attack. Drastic measures for fully accounting the facts surrounding the attacks and for debate of all reasonable responses to them, the U.S.-led coalition chose to respond to the violence with more violence–massive military retaliation framed as a Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). Even fewer will perform a dispassionate cost/benefit analysis of the GWOT, both from strategic and ethical standpoints. In contrast, it can be argued that the US-led counterterrorism strategy initiated by the Bush administration and primarily preserved by Obama’s should be reexamined because it has been shown to be largely ineffective in reducing the global incidence and lethality of acts of political violence Western leaders brand terrorist.

 

References

Click to access CSP-29-2-Knopf.pdf

Click to access TWQ_12Spring_Kroenig_Pavel.pdf

Click to access 12_re_bock_gb.pdf

Click to access IS2006.pdf

https://www.tikkun.org/newsite/the-ethics-and-efficacy-of-the-war-on-terrorism-fighting-terror-without-terror-or-how-to-give-peace-a-chance

 
Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?