Meaningful Life: Philosophy


When considering positive psychology, meaningful life can be viewed as a construct that has to do mainly with the purpose, fulfillment, satisfaction and most crucial significance in consideration to life in general. A meaningful life, in this case, tends to links different relativities of life that are biological mainly to a symbolic interpretation or meaning. In this regard, those who possess a sense of purpose thus tend to be found as being happier, and in this case, they tend to have a lower level of emotions that are negative and also to have lower risks related to mantel illnesses (Wolf, 2017). The meaning of life and most importantly why it matter tend to focus mainly on great questions of life. These questions include whey we are here, where there is a particular thing rather than nothing and also reasons for the existence of cosmos.

In this regard, a strongly support Susan Wolf in consideration to her suggestion of the meaningful life. Meaningfulness, in this case, focuses mainly on living one’s life. Each has his or her own life. And in this case, each of these people has a purpose or an aim in their lives in general. As a result, life can, therefore, be considered as meaningful in one way or another (Boden, Feldman, Fischer, Hare, Hume, Joske & Luper, 2016). There are a lot of things and work that has been found in the recent past with a primary aim of understanding things that will significantly contribute to making life more meaningful and in one way or another. Typically, all useful life tends to have two different parts. These are mainly subjective and objective elements. As a result, these elements will significantly make life to be more meaningful and in one way or another (Hicks, Seto & Kim, 2015). As a result, it does not necessarily mean that an individual must, therefore, complete an entire project and successful excel in different activities, but other things need to be equal. Typically, the more successful that an individual will be in a particular project or activity will significantly result in a more case they can substantially contribute to the meaning of an individual’s life in general.

Furthermore, there is also a great need for an individual to have a particular relation to their activities and projects effectively. As one specific relation, it tends to overlap different aspects that seem to have two main elements. One of these aspects mainly loves association. In this case, it can be related to the case where wolf tends to claim that a person must, therefore, enjoy a particular project or activity which should also be relevant, have an established subjective attraction towards them, and most importantly be excited and even gripped in consideration to these projects in general (Wolf, 2017). As a result, it is clear that an individual must thus be passionate with the attention of these activities and projects. Other than that, it also seems to entail that people’s willingness to mainly have pursued to a given project must, therefore, be diachronically stable.

On the other hand, the second aspect to consider in this case is mainly the fulfillment side. In this case, it requires one, and primarily when they are successful in engaging in a given project, there must experience some sensations that are positive. This sanitation can be considered as fulfillment, feeling good, satisfaction, and most importantly happy in general (Wolf, 2016). This case is the main reason that makes Wolf focus mainly on emphasizing that there is a great need to avoid not being single felt quality present in any case. But in this case, there is a wide range of experiences that are positive. Some of the experiences shall, therefore, be required to present in different instances.

When considering the objective side, activities, and projects related to a person must, therefore, be objectively worthwhile in general. In this case, one way that an individual might consider when starting from a given idea and mainly about this case is primarily to consider starting from a belief that they can be either more or even less successful in their recognized objectives.


In this regard, I strongly support the idea presented by Susan Wolf in consideration to a meaningful life. For a wolf, the concept related to meaningfulness is essential as it tends to allow an adequate definition of a class of different actions that will neither configured by people’s interest which in this case can be considered as being selfish and well-being in general nor by the demand related to morality (Wolf, 2017). Typically, it is evident that not everything that people fails to do for others they do for themselves in general.



Boden, M. A., Feldman, F., Fischer, J. M., Hare, R., Hume, D., Joske, W. D., … & Luper, S. (2016). Life, death, and meaning: Key philosophical readings on the big questions. Rowman & Littlefield.

Hicks, J. A., Seto, E., & Kim, J. (2015). Meaning of Life. The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging, 1-5.

Wolf, Susan, (2010). “The Meanings of Lives” in John Perry, Michael Bratman, and John Martin Fischer, Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contmporary Readings.

Williams, R. J. (2016). Life Projects: Passion versus Rationality.

Wolf, S. M. (2017). Beyond “genetic discrimination”: toward the broader harm of geneticism. In Genetics and Gene Therapy (pp. 159-167). Routledge.

Wolf, S. (2016). Meaningfulness: A third dimension of the good life. Foundations of Science21(2), 253-269.

Wolf, S. (2016). The Meaning of Lives. Life, Death, and Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions, 113.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?