Politics and Economic globalization

Economic globalization is the increasing in economic incorporation and interdependence of regional, national and local economies across the world through a strengthening of cross-border movement of capital, services, goods and technologies. If this was meant to happen without fail, it should serve the people and not the interests of some big corporations. Any advancement in the economy of any country should be meant to upgrade the live of the people and not to serve the interests of the big corporations. Though I never chose where to be born, I am proud of my country but I do not always support it. If my country is doing something that hurts other people, I am against it. We are all equal no mater the race or religion.

No race is superior to another and no person is superior to the other. We are all equally created with different capabilities. Whether poor or rich, we all have a right to freedom, a right to be served, a right to enjoy economic growth and a right to pay taxes based on our earnings. Discrimination on the basis of economic status, race, religion or beliefs should be unheard off. However, when it comes to protecting the boundaries of a country, necessary action should be taken to ensure the security of the people. Peoples’ security is more important than obeying the international rules. We are who we are by the choices we make, but when another person influences these choices, they no longer make us who we are. Freedom of choice is equally important. Homosexuality is not natural but a choice, which should be respected.

To be moral does not necessarily require one to be religious. Everyone knows what is right and what is wrong. There are laws that guide our morality. Being moral or immoral is a choice and not necessarily influenced by religion. You do not require religion to tell you that killing for no reason is immoral. The law already prohibits the same. The penalty of death should never be an option. Every one has a right to life. Religion itself is a choice. Religion should not be instilled on people; it should be their choice to make.

The parent should not dictate the religion of the child and the government should not dictate which religion is superior to the other. All religions are equal in their beliefs. In the name of eradicating terrorism, the rights and freedom of some people are abused. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. However, it has become a habit for suspects to be mistreated based on countering terrorism. Just because one is, a suspect does not make them guilty.

Democracy sometimes hinders development. Imagine a country with one party system. No development decisions are delayed as compared to more than one party system. Though this is risky in terms of monitoring, it saves quality time. Democracy is very expensive in terms of time. It takes time to make a decision in a democratic country due to the complicated steps involved. Again, the opposition always opposes the ruling party’s decisions just to make a point. Am not refuting that democracy is important but it wastes a lot of time and resources.

The greatest assumption of democracy is that whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their government. This notion is very famous in presidential debates and political rallies. It is believed that when people are ignorant and misinformed, furnishing them with knowledge is the best remedy. Facts will set them free and enlighten them.  However, recent research has revealed that facts do not have the power to change the human mind. When furnished with facts, people become stronger in their belief other than changing their mind. It is threatening for people to admit that they are wrong. Most people believe that their opinions have been formed after a series of considerations of ideas and facts meaning our decisions are intelligent.

The reality is that our beliefs are based on our opinions. Beliefs dictate the facts we choose rather than facts driving beliefs. Beliefs cause us to twist facts to fit our already conceived notions. Politically, people who are ignorant of facts have the strongest political opinions. People seek consistency. They interpret information to fall in line with their preexisting views. When people belief in something, they will gladly accept any information that confirms those beliefs and belief it to be, true and very actively dismiss any information that does not support their belief. Once such facts are internalized, changing them becomes nearly impossible.

Factual misperceptions about politics are very persistent. From a normative perspective, it is significant to try to determine if misperceptions, which distort public opinion, can be corrected. Studies show that attempts to correct this misperception fail to reduce them in the most committed people. It is even worse in that they strengthen the misperceptions among ideological subgroups.  A direct test about the factual beliefs on politics revealed that responses to corrections about contentious political issues very steadily by ideology. Again, corrective information in the news can fail to reduce misperceptions but in return increase them. . Most frequently, misinformation is commonly related to one’s political preferences.

In ad ideal world, people would be able to maintain a constant alertness, monitoring the information received and the brains process it. The brain, however, has to process a lot of information in a short period, which is exhausting.  The brain is thus designed to create shortcuts in terms of inferences, intuition among others to avoid the discomfort of the exhaust. To avoid people from getting the wrong information, the ideal remedy is to focus on the source of the information. Increasing the reputational cost of disclosing bad information, for example, would discourage people from doing so often.

The pillar of democracy is information. Informed people make sound decisions. However, people tend to pay attention to information that only supports their preconceived ideas. Instead of embracing the true information, people hang on to their beliefs. This is the major challenge to democracy. Political leaders take advantage of peoples beliefs and make them belief bad information. The human brain creates shortcuts, which are hard to crush. The conception that people s beliefs are made by continued analysis of facts makes even harder for the same people to admit that they are wrong. People who think they know while in the real sense they do not know are the most persistent. People conceive beliefs from opinions rather than facts. They only accept facts that support their belief rather than believing in the facts to change their belief.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?