BOSCAGLIA, N., CLARKE, D. M., JOBLING, T. W., & QUINN, M. A. (2005). The contribution of spirituality and spiritual coping to anxiety and depression in women with a recent diagnosis of gynecological cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 15(5), 755-761.
The objective of this study was to work out whether or not, once accounting for religious involvement and beliefs, and positive and negative religious header may account for any of the variations in anxiety and depression among ladies among one year’s diagnosing of medical specialty cancer. The author concludes that spirituality and spiritual coping are important to women with cancer and that health professionals in the area should consider these issues.
Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on Religion, Spirituality, and Mental Health: A Review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 283–291.
This article talk about the religious and religious factors are more and more being examined in medical specialty analysis. Non secular beliefs and practices have long been joined to hysteria, neurosis, and psychotic delusions. However, recent studies have known another facet of faith that will function a psychological and social resource for dealing with stress. When process the terms faith and spirituality, this paper reviews analysis on the relation between faith and (or) spirituality, and psychological state, that specialize in depression, suicide, anxiety, psychosis, and misuse. The results of Associate in nursing earlier systematic review are mentioned, and newer studies within us, Canada, Europe, and alternative countries are delineated. Whereas non secular beliefs and practices will represent powerful sources of comfort, hope, and which means, they’re typically elaborately entangled with neurotic and psychotic disorders, typically creating it tough to work out whether or not they are a resource or a liability.
Moreira-Almeida, A., Lotufo Neto, F., & Koenig, H. G. (2006). Religiousness and mental health: a review. Revista brasileira de psiquiatria, 28(3), 242-250.
This paper reviews the scientific proof offered for the connection between faith and mental state. Conjointly the authors gift the most studies and conclusions of a bigger systematic review of 850 studies on the religion-mental health relationship printed throughout the twentieth Century known through many databases. This paper conjointly includes associate update on the papers printed since 2000, together with researches performed in Brazil and a short historical and method background. And Theoretical pathways of the religiousness-mental health association and clinical implications of those findings are mentioned.
Ross, C. E. (1990). Religion and psychological distress. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 236-245.
The author did this paper by employing a sample of Illinois residents (and dominant for sociodemographics and disposition to specific feelings). And he found that the stronger an individual’s faith, the lower the extent of psychological distress. This supports the concept that faith reduces demoralization and provides hope and that means. However, the author found that persons with no faith likewise had low levels of distress. Thus, there was a curving impact of nonsecular belief on distress. Additionally, the author found that Protestants had very cheap distress levels, followed by Catholics, Jews, and others. Variations in belief systems, however, particularly a belief within the Yankee Protestant ethic, didn’t make a case for variations in distress among nonsecular teams. The strength of nonsecular beliefs seems to be a lot of vital than content in explaining the impact of faith on psychological distress.
Williams, D. R., Larson, D. B., Buckler, R. E., Heckmann, R. C., & Pyle, C. M. (1991). Religion and psychological distress in a community sample. Social Science & Medicine, 32(11), 1257-1262.
This paper examines the result of nonsecular group action and affiliation on psychological distress in a very longitudinal community study of 720 adults. nonsecular affiliation is unrelated to mental state standing. In distinction, though nonsecular group action doesn’t directly scale back psychological distress, it buffers the hurtful effects of stress on mental state. That is, within the face of nerve-racking events and physical health issues, nonsecular group action reduces the adverse consequences of those stressors on psychological well-being.
Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?