The concept of freedom of speech has been problematic for a long time now. There have been numerous debates among the people regarding this issue. There are people who believe that the freedom of speech should be restricted to some extent while others think that this is not appropriate. The constitution has given everyone the right to express themselves and offer their opinions on varied issues. This should be done without any form of interference. But to what extent is this freedom deemed feasible?
It is appropriate for the government to impede freedom of speech on some occasions due to a variety of reasons. To begin with, “speech acts can be closely related to the execution of physical acts. This is to mean that most people tend to react in undesirable ways based on what they hear, read and watch” (Rudanko 116). Actions such as hate speech are likely to amount to war crimes in the long-run. This is the same case with political polemic
To view this post and other posts in this category please pay the amount below