Trump’s Inaugural Committee Subpoena

Trump’s Inaugural Committee Subpoena

CNN and CBNC have accurately covered the subpoena issued to Trump’s Inaugural Committee.The investigation delves into the money Trump misspent on this event, and where it was sourced (Burnett, Borger, and Kelly; Barria). The two outlets communicate the same message although the details slightly differ. CNN and CBNC agree on the cause of the subpoena and investigation but digress on the amount, donors, and how the money was spent.

The two outlets explain the cause of the subpoena. In both, Trump’s inauguration committee is under investigationby the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. CNN and CBNC report that the federal persecutors subpoenaed President Trump’s inauguration committee for documents that relate to the vendors, finances, and donors of his inauguration party (Burnett et al.). Regardless, CNN is more detailed as it mentions the specific documents, which relate to donors and vendors. Both CNN and CBNC report the cause for President Trump’s committee subpoena

Equally, both outlets avail investigation details although CNN is more detailed. CBNC states that the investigation is part of a series of criminal inquiries into the campaign and presidency of Donald Trump. The Attorney’s Office led by Robert Mueller is looking into Trump’s relationship with Russia and his role in obstructing the current investigations (Barria). Further, the investigation is meant to reveal illegal activities like the hush-money that two women received so that any likely sex scandals would not be revealed. CNN has additional crimes against which the committee is being accused. The list includes crimes like mail and wire frauds, conspiracy against the USA, money laundering, violations of laws pertaining to the contribution of foreign nations, and disclosure violations to the list. Both vendors reveal the content of the investigation by the Attorney’s Office.

The outlets differ on the amount being investigated. According to CNN, Trump’s committee had misspent more than 100 million dollars (Burnett et al.).Conversely, CBNC claims that Trump misused 107 million dollars on the event. CNN offers an estimate of over 100 million dollars, while CBNC is sure that the amount is 107 million dollars, which is a stark difference.

The mention of donors also varies. CBNC generally points out that Trump may have had donors from nations like Qatar and Saudi Arabia.By contrast, CNN not only mentions these states but narrows down to Imaad Zuberi and his company Avenue Venture. Zuberi supposedly donated 900,000 dollars to the inauguration from his own pockets (Burnett et al.). The spokesperson added that Zuberi was unaware of the subpoena and was shocked that he was named alone. Both highlight the donors, but CNN specifically mentions the parties and the amount they contributed.

CNN and CBNC agree on the cause of the subpoena and investigation but digress on the amount, donors, and how the money was spent. CNN and CBNC concur that the subpoena was for relevant documents to the investigation, which was looking into misspent money. CNN and CBNC, however, differed on the exact sum spent. Notably, CNN is more detailed regarding the parties subpoenaed and the crimes Trump’s committee is accused of. Both outlets have detailed information on the subpoena issue, although CNN is a better read.

 

Works Cited

Burnett, Erin, Gloria Borger, and Caroline Kelly. “Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee.” CNN. CNN, 5th Feb 2019. Retrieved fromhttps://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/04/politics/sdny-subpoena-trump-inauguration-committee/index.html

Barria, Carlos. “Federal prosecutors in New York subpoena Trump’s inaugural committee.” CBNC. CBNC, 5th Feb 2019. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/05/federal-prosecutors-in-new-york-subpoena-trumps-inaugural-committee.html

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?

Custom Essay writing Service