For this article critique I would suggest three ways of critiquing: 1. What steps towards inter-rater reliability did Rentzou (2017) take, and how effective do you think these were? 2. What were the key arguments Rentzou (2017) made in the paper, and; 3. How were these substantiated through the methodological approach taken? Finally, where are the gaps? PLEASE ENSURE THESE QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED THROUGHOUT THE ESSAY.