Please answer this question from the perspective of administrative law and focus on the analysis of the legal issues. CNN’s reporter, Jim Acosta, recently lost his hard press pass to the White House for a period of time.

(A) What were the arguments cited by the Trump administration for its action and as justification of its action?

(B) What were the arguments made by the CNN and amicus briefs for the press?  (C) On what grounds was the court ruling made?

(D) What does the White House need to do to legally comply with the briefing on the grounds stated by the ruling in going forward to create rules?  What other issues, if any might the White House need to consider, other than those specifically ruled on?

(E) In the meantime, is there anything the President can do to stop Acosta from asking questions in practical terms?

Note well: First, do not comment on the President’s motives, political ramifications, or the consequence the actions, decisions, etc. Answer this strictly as a legal issue–please don’t give me homilies on the importance of the press or the reverse! Second:  Be careful to not to use the broad term Constitutional, when you can be more specific; that is,

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?