I agree with response B as it seeks to create a balance between protecting animals’ rights and ensuring that there are opportunities to make new drug inventions. Abolishing all researches is wrongly advised as there is the need to find cures to degenerative diseases, cancer, HIV/Aids, stroke, and other complications. I believe that while we have the duty to protect animals, there ought to be similar efforts towards reducing the suffering of persons experiencing chronic conditions (Doke and Dhawale, 2015). There is thus the possibility of making more innovations while equally reducing the corresponding costs and impacts.

It is worth noting that the Food and Drugs Agency requires that extensive trials be made before any product can be used on human beings. While coming up with new medicines, scientists may be unaware of the long term effects. While some effects can be evaluated using Vitro models and computer-modeling techniques, animal testing is still necessary. However, the concerned parties ought to act rational and reduce any waste or possible harm on the animals. While animal testing may wholly be banned in the cosmetic industry, such a move would have adverse implications in the pharmaceutical industry. In the past, there has an increase in the prevalence of chronic health conditions.

Other than focusing on the gains that are made in medicine, equal consideration needs to be made in implementing the Animal Welfare Act. The Act does not abolish the use of animals in research but seeks to set guidelines that must be observed by scientists. It outlines that minimal standards and policies that must be upheld (Rayburn et al. 2018). I believe that following this Act will offer an ideal framework where medical innovations can be made while also reducing the levels of animal sufferings.

References

Doke, S. K., & Dhawale, S. C. (2015). Alternatives to animal testing: A review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23(3), 223-229.

Rayburn, E. R., Gao, L., Ding, J., Ding, H., Shao, J., & Li, H. (2018). FDA-approved drugs that are spermatotoxic in animals and the utility of animal testing for human risk prediction. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 35(2), 191-212.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?