Efficacy of Pelvis Reposition Exercise in the process of treating Pelvis Floor Muscles (PFM) irregularity

Efficacy of Pelvis Reposition Exercise in the process of treating Pelvis Floor Muscles (PFM) irregularity

This research article aims at assessing the efficacy of Pelvis Reposition Exercise in the process of treating Pelvis Floor Muscles (PFM) irregularity. This study hypothesized that Pelvic Floor Muscle irregularity might have a significant and functional cause in relation to Lumbopelvic multifaceted misalignment. The authors of this research article have also speculated that reinstating the pelvis into its normal position would facilitate alignment of asymmetrical Pelvis Floor Muscles. The study design entails the use of a comparable group trial with other follow-up activities.


The Material, participants and procedures in this study were all experimentally based. The study involved thirty young women who were categorized into two. The first category was experimental while the second one was control. In the experimental group, a trial of 15 minutes was carried out with regard to Pelvis Reposition Exercise. Some of the examinations that were in accordance with the materials and participants included the Ober, Thomas and trans-abdominal PFM tests. For the experimental category, all tests were performed twice. This was through a baseline approach and after each 15 minutes process of pelvis reposition. The control group also had its tests performed at baseline and after every half an hour of rest.

Study Findings

The assessments performed in the experimental group were positive for both the Ober and the Thomas tests in most of the participants. After the examination exercise, there were improvements noted on both the Ober and Thomas tests. The Ultrasonographic assessments on PFM made during rest showed some sense asymmetry. The reinstatement of symmetry PFM after the repositioning exercise was observed in the first category. However, there were no significant changes in the control categories.


The most significant information that can be extracted from this study is how important it is to recover the the symmetry of PFM and how it works after pelvis reposition. The experimental category, during controlled pelvic exercise, at rest and at baseline, asymmetry in the PFM was observed. Furthermore, other functional tests exhibited pelvis movement in relation to body alignment. After the repositioning exercise, the present asymmetry was significantly reduced especially during resting and controlled contraction. Also, from the improvement observed in the functional tests, it is worth concluding that the reposition exercises contributed to the symmetrical alignment witnessed in the pelvis. This is a clear indication that potential factors like pelvis alignment should be considered when diagnosing PFM asymmetry.


This study has a few flaws that should be addressed for the accuracy and consistency of future research. The study sample consisted of participants that had no significant signs of urinary complications. So, the study findings may not be accurate for extrapolation to patients suffering from pelvic floor ailments. It is therefore worth noting that future studies should include subjects with PFM complications to open further research opportunities on pelvis reposition efficiency.


In conclusion, the restoration of PFM symmetry may suggest that reposition exercises aid in the treatment of asymmetry.  This is as a result of how the findings and discussions suggest how reposition exercises are crucial in pelvis symmetry and its alignment in relation to the body axis.


The practical implications of this study indicate that proper diagnosis showing the source of PFM asymmetry should include other factors like muscle length and pelvic alignment. The study findings might also be significant to women with end pelvic defects and qualify for surgical defects.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?

Custom Essay writing Service