In a no-suicide contract, a suicide patient is expected to sign a contract stating that he/she will never commit suicide within a given period. The patient is given an alternative option, for example, to call 999 or rush to an emergency room in case they get such a thought. The tactic gets used as a way of preventing suicide and assessing suicide among patients. The contract gives an opportunity in which human relatedness and personal connection interact to get a distinction. It bases its assumption that the strength of the relationship between a particular clinician and a specific patient are significant in stopping a person from making a decision that may harm their health and life. In cases where there is no strength of the relationship between a physician and the patient then clinicians tend to belie that human behavior has its root on childhood upbringing and genes which must portray itself despite the efforts to stop people from committing suicide.

The no-suicide contract has some assumptions. To start with, clinicians believe that if a patient is unwilling to sign a no-suicide contract, then it implies that they do not need moral support and that they are already decided to commit suicide. Disagreeing to sign the contract is used as an assessment tool since the cat may imply many issues. Agreeing to sign the contract may also show the patient has a disingenuous attempt to avoid any interference with their suicidal intent. It thus suggests both agreeing and disagreeing to approve the deal are not sufficient in determining the importance and meaning of refusal. Suicidal contact is also limited to give better results since it shows that a clinician using the approach is more concerned about the legal mechanism rather than on finding out the reason why a patient wants to commit suicide. It then shows that a no-suicide contract cannot be used in a detailed assessment of suicidal risk.

No-suicide contracts do not necessarily help to solve the situation. Most patents view the contract as a way to protect the clinician but not a form of protecting them. Many people sign the contract and still proceed to commit suicide in fear of breaking the contract. It should then get noted that unless there is a strong relationship between the patient and clinician, then this type of suicide protection strategy cannot work effectively. Clients should be made to feel free to share any suicidal thoughts to the clinicians without having to wait to fear any legal action that may be taken against them.

Many strategies can be used to deal with a suicide patient. The first strategy is to get informed consent from the patient. Informed consent is used to predict the psychological behavior of a patient. It gives the boundaries, limits, and rules with which a clinician can go in treating a patient. Adequate assessment of risk can also be used in treating suicide patients. Assessment risks to a patient are helpful to a psychologist since they help to understand the potential for suicidal behavior. Another critical thing that can be used as a contract to treat suicide is the use of empirically supported treatments which improves the chances of getting the right treatment for suicide patients.

In conclusions, there is a need to do extensive research on how to deal with suicide patients. Currently, there is an increase in the number of patients dying due to suicide issues. Clinicians should emphasize on creating a positive relationship with the patients as a way of showing compassionate for treating suicide patients.

Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?