Fairness in the Criminal Justice System

Fairness in the Criminal Justice System

Most of the people expect the criminal justice system to be fair. Based on what a person values, the process can be determined by political affiliations, ideology or a case of an unfair criminal justice system. However, most of the instances have lacked clarity noon the extent that the fair should address. Lack of a clear outline often results in conflicts. For example, most of them is a case where male representative are overrepresented such as the case of the U.S. prisons. Such cases then result in the unfairness of the outcome. Racial discriminations have been prevalent in the U.S. criminal justice system. It caused controversies among different societies. Most of the people are of the view that the blacks faced unlawful arrest compared to the whites. It also applies to those to those who have more economic resources. Secondly, Gun violence policy is one of the examples that can be used to govern the criminal justice policies based on vertical context. For instance, individuals found with gun violence should be exposed to different rates of judgment or imprisonment. Based on what the victims present, the criminal policy should punish based on the injuries and the harm caused to the victim. The more the , the more the time and punishment exposed to the accused. However, this would not be vertically fair since gun violence could increase. Similarly, horizontal fairness would not apply equally to the case where criminal justice provides a similar duration of incarceration for a given group of individuals that tend to originate from similar ethnic community or age group.

Technology has had both beneficial and harmful effects to the criminal justice. Technology has created many compromised instances in criminal justice. On the other hand, it has boosted investigations and promoted fairness to a greater extent. However, minimizing the rates of cybercrime and enhancing security across major corporations would facilitate its ability to reduce crime. Moreover, technology is one of the most convenient methods of accessing and evaluating evidence from the scene of a crime, and this has been evident in most of the cases that require minute details of biological chemical and precise tracking of the crime occurrence. It is monitoring vital areas prone to crime. As a result, crime has reduced. The latest drone and surveillance technology has boosted fight against terror, and this has also reduced crime to a greater extent.

The interaction between the public and the police varies significantly. However, differentiating different groups of people is challenged by many factors especially for the case of multiracial ethnicities. Black and white are a term that viewed as a racial aspect that divides people based on color thus facilitating racial discriminations Major crime issues have long been linked to one ethnic group thus affecting fairness. Besides, the police have more disparity when analyzing crime involving people originating from the two racial groups. Proactive policing conducted by the National Alliance Academy of Science has focused on these groups since significant disparities reported have often sideline either of the groups. Even though the other groups are profoundly affected, the process has not however reached extreme levels to the extent of achieving the rates as such of blacks and whites. Besides, the blacks were intensively discriminated compared to other racial groups, and this, therefore, can account for the choices made for the policing.

The rates of arrest between blacks and whites showed high rates of ethnic-based discriminations. The blacks have at a higher percentage of capture compared to the whites. Therefore, the racial disparity remains in place. For instance, the reports from California showed that the overrepresentation of blacks in terms of arrest. Through the benchmarking conducted y the bureau, many significant issues were seen through the misrepresentation of the blacks and other minority groups in both U.S. and California. This, however, can be attributed to the long term perception and association of crime and the blacks Discrimination rates are still rampant i the two communities thus influencing the figures. However, the benchmarking shed some light into the criminal justice system. Through the calculations provided the various context of relative racial and discrimination rates. Besides, it outlined essential factors that described the distribution of such groups across the communities. However, the price at which the cases reported reasonably failed to validate the calculations.

CA POST has already taken policies aimed at improving services at the department. The PERFs CDM review considered different systems that included accountability transparency use if force tactics and engagement in the community. Through the outlined reports, the adoption of the required procedural justice has reduced the rates of injustice. The society is also influenced by improper arrest and lack of transparency and excessive use of force in one racial group.

Procedural justice is one of necessary procedure required in resolving disputes. Therefore, administration of justice is one of the goals that the legal proceedings aim to achieve in delivering the needed rulings Besides the process can also be applied in criminal context thus providing reliable systems required in addressing major conflicts connected to due process fundamental justice and procedural fairness. The method even tries to divides of burden and deliver the chief retributive justice where required. CDM, therefore, relates to the outlined standards provided through the procedural justice. It follows the law enforcement practices with the aim of delivering fairness and addressing significant issues of injustice.  However, CDM  is different in the range it covers its methods since it allows a step by step procedures aimed at reducing sources of conflicts that occur when trying to resolve a case. Crime data modernization is one of the most efficient methods of  delivering uniform crime reporting Unlike the procedural justice it has automated response procedure. Its reporting is one of the most efficient. It collaborates with other law enforcement agencies with the aim of delivering justice. The crime data is published and assigned to criminal justice information services. Besides, its procedure is more efficient and fast compared to the procedural reporting. As compared to the ideas of the procedural justice it creates applies similar rationality in delivering the crime reporting. However, the process differs due to significant collaboration evident through the CDM. The model preferable for training officers would be the CDM This is one of the methods that has adopted technology and intensified its investigation strategies thus providing an opportunity to create an effective training program. Besides, the criminal justice system has diversified into technology-based practices and collaboration with different groups across the world. Therefore CDM would offer such an opportunity especially in a case where the officers require empowerment.

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?

Custom Essay writing Service