How Time and Money Differences of Mental Accounting Affect Customer Satisfaction among People of Different Cultures

How Time and Money Differences of Mental Accounting Affect Customer Satisfaction among People of Different Cultures

DECLARATION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

To be attached to any assignment, dissertation or project work submitted for assessment as part of a University assessment.  I/We have read and understood the Business School and University Regulations on Cheating and Plagiarism.

I/We am/are aware that the University defines plagiarism as presenting someone else’s work, in whole or in part, as your own.  Work means any intellectual output, and typically includes text, data, images, sound or performance.

I promise that in the attached submission I have not presented anyone else’s work, in whole or in part, as my own and I have not colluded with others in the preparation of this work.  Where I have taken advantage of the work of others, I have given full acknowledgement.  I have not resubmitted my own work or part thereof without specific written permission to do so from the University staff concerned when any of this work has been or is being submitted for  marks or credits even if in a different module or for a different qualification or completed prior to entry to the University.  I have read and understood the University’s published rules on plagiarism and also any more detailed rules specified at School or module level.  I know that if I commit plagiarism I can be expelled from the University and that it is my responsibility to be aware of the University’s regulations on plagiarism and their importance.

I re-confirm my consent to the University copying and distributing any or all of my work in any form and using third parties (who may be based outside the EU/EEA) to monitor breaches of regulations, to verify whether my work contains plagiarised material, and for quality assurance purposes.

I confirm that I have declared all mitigating circumstances that may be relevant to the assessment of this piece of work and that I wish to have taken into account.  I am aware of the University’s policy on mitigation and the School’s procedures for the submission of statements and evidence of mitigation.  I am aware of the penalties imposed for the late submission of coursework.

 

LUBS/MATH         M

 

MODULE TITLE:                                                                                                              

SIGNED:   DATE:
 

NAME (S): [CAPITAL LETTERS]:

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to thank all the people that have contributed directly and indirectly to the success of this research work. My sincere thanks go to all the participants who gave their time and candid opinion on the research questions.

My special gratitude goes to my research supervisor, Peter Cullen for his directions and support during the course of this research. Also, my thanks go to my colleagues and the members of Leeds University Business School for their guidance and support.

Finally, I appreciate all the support provided by family members, and class colleagues.

 

ABSTRACT

While satisfaction and mental accounting are heavily researched constructs in the theory of consumer behavior, the primary focus has been on customer expectations and product performance, with limited focus being directed at how time and money differences of mental accounting affects customer satisfaction, and whether this influence on satisfaction assessment varies across people of different cultures. The present study applies a mental accounting model to suggest that time and money differences of mental accounting affect and influence customer satisfaction and the satisfaction with product or service performance varies across customers from different cultural backgrounds. Specifically, time costs and money costs of mental accounting influence customer satisfaction with positive product performance outcomes, and across customers from different cultures, time costs and money costs of mental accounting influence satisfaction differently. Focus groups discussions provided evidence of asymmetric satisfaction processes for time versus money across people of different cultures.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENT

DECLARATION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY.. ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.. iii

ABSTRACT.. iv

TABLE OF CONTENT.. v

FIGURES AND TABLES. vii

CHAPTER ONE:…. INTRODUCTION.. 1

1.1       Introduction.. 1

1.2       Research Problem.. 2

1.3       Research Questions. 3

1.4       Aim of the Study.. 3

1.5       Significance of the study.. 4

1.6       Scope and Limitations of the Study.. 4

1.7       Organization of Study.. 5

CHAPTER TWO:…. LITERATURE REVIEW… 6

2.0       Introduction.. 6

2.1       Search Strategy.. 6

2.2       Mental Accounting.. 6

2.2.1    Mental Accounting and its Influence on Consumer Consumption Decision. 10

2.2.2    Costs of Time and Money and how they Affect Consumers’ Satisfaction. 12

2.2.3    Consumer Satisfaction and the Influence of Cultural Differences. 15

2.2.4    How Individuals with Different Cultures Treat Time Differently. 17

2.3       Overview of Literature. 19

CHAPTER THREE:…. METHODOLOGY.. 20

3.0       Introduction.. 20

3.1       Research Design.. 20

3.2       Sample and Sampling Methods. 21

3.3       Data Collection.. 22

3.3.1    Data Collection Method. 22

3.3.2    Data Collection Instruments. 22

3.3.3    Data Collection Procedure. 23

3.4       Data Entry.. 23

3.5       Data Analysis. 24

3.6       Research Credibility.. 24

3.6.1    Reliability. 24

3.6.2    Validity. 25

3.7       Ethical Considerations. 25

CHAPTER FOUR:…. DATA FINDINGS AND PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. 26

4.1       Introduction.. 26

4.2       Data Interpretation and Findings. 26

4.3       Conclusion.. 30

CHAPTER FIVE:…. DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION.. 31

5.1       Introduction.. 31

5.2       Overview.. 31

5.3       Discussion of the Specific Objectives. 31

5.4       Conclusion.. 35

CHAPTER SIX:….. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 36

6.1       Introduction.. 36

6.2       Conclusion and Limitation of the Study.. 36

6.3       Implications of the Study.. 38

6.4       Recommendations. 39

References. 40

APPENDIX I:….. RESEARCH CONSENT FORM… 46

APPENDIX II:…. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION  SCENARIO AND QUESTIONS. 47

 

 

References

Anderson, Eugene W., ClaesFornell, and Sanal K. Mazvancheryl. 2004. ―Customer

Satisfaction and Shareholder Value.Journal of Marketing 68: 172-185.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston, Massachusetts: Cengage Learning.

Becker, Gary S. 1965. ―A Theory of the Allocation of Time.Economic Journal 75: 493-517.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. New York,NY: Oxford University Press.

Cabaniss, D. L., Cherry, S., Douglas, C. J., & Schwartz, A. R. (2011). Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Clinical Manual. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Churchill, Jr., Gilbert A. and Carol Surprenant. 1982. ―An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 491-504.

Collins, H. (2010). Creative research: the theory and practice of research for the creative industries. Ava Publishing.

Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2013). Business research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (2015). Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. London: Routledge.

Duxbury, D., Keasey, K., Zhang, H. and Chow, S.L., 2005. Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology26(4), pp.567-580.

Grinblatt, M. and Han, B., 2005.Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of financial economics78(2), pp.311-339.

Gurhan-Canli, Z., &Maheswaran, D. (2000). “Cultural Variations in Country of Origin Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, August, pp. 309-17.

Hall, H., & Roussel, L. (2012). Evidence-Based Practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Hawkins, D. I., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Best, R. J. (2007).Con­sumer Behaviour: Building Marketing Strategy (10th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Heath, Chip and Jack B. Soll. 1996. ―Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions. Journal Of Consumer Research 23: 40-52.

Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. . Guilford Press.

Johnson, G. (2014). Research Methods for ppublic Administrators. ME Sharpe.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47,263–291.

Keillor, B. D., Parker, R. S., & Schaffer, A. (1996), “Influences on Adolescent Brand Preferences in the United States and Mexico, Journal of Advertising Research, May-June, pp. 47-56.

Kitakyushu, 2010.Mental accounting and framing of sale promotions. Japan: BAI 2010 International Conference on Business and Information, 2010.

Lynch, John G., Jr., Richard G. Netemeyer, Stephen A. Spiller, and Alessandra Zammit. 2010. ―A Generalizable Scale of Propensity to Plan: The Long and the Short of Planning for Time and for Money. Journal of Consumer Research 37: 108-128.

Mittal, Vikas, Jerome M. Katrichis, and Pankaj Kumar. 2001. ―Attribute Performance and Customer Satisfaction over Time: Evidence from Two Field Studies. Journal of Services Marketing 15: 343–56.

Mittal, Vikas, Pankaj Kumar, and Michael Tsiros. 1999. ―Attribute-Level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions over Time: A Consumption-System Approach. Journal of Marketing 63: 88–101.

Moon, P., Keasey, K., & Duxbury, D. (1999). Mental accounting and decision making: The relationship between relative and absolute savings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 145–153.

Mooij, M de. (2004). Consumer Behavior and Culture (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 162-64.

Mooij, M de. (1998). Global Marketing and Advertising, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 752-53

Mooiji De., & Hofstede (2002) “Convergence and Divergence in Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Advertising Research, January-February, pp 79-89.

Morgan, D. L. (1998). The Focus Group Guide Book. London: Sage Publications.

Oliver, Richard L. 1980. ―A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.Journal of Marketing Research 17: 460-469.

Phelps, R., Fisher, K., & Ellis, A. (2007). Organizing and Managing Your Research: A Practical Guide for Postgraduates. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Rajagopal, P. and Rha, J.Y., 2009. The mental accounting of time. Journal of Economic Psychology30(5), pp.772-781.

Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (2013). Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 191-211.

Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Veliova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, F. C., . . . Lyons, J. C. (2013). ISOQOL Recommends Minimum Standards for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures used in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1889-1905.

Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Schuiling, I., Lambin, J.-J., & Chumpitaz, R. (2007). Market-Driven Management: Strategic and Operational Marketing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shefrin, H., Statman, M.,1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 40,777–790.

Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Thousands Oaks, California: SAGE.

Siu, S.C., Sermer, M., Colman, J.M., Alvarez, A.N., Mercier, L.A., Morton, B.C., Kells, C.M., Bergin, M.L., Kiess, M.C., Marcotte, F. and Taylor, D.A., 2001.Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation104(5), pp.515-521.

Soman, Dilip. 2001. ―The Mental Accounting of Sunk Time Costs: Why Time is not Like Money. Journal of Behavior Decision Making 14: 169-185.

Soster, R. L. (2011). Costs of time versus money: A mental accounting view of satisfaction (Order No. 3454823). Available from ABI/INFORM Collection; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (870954745). Retrieved from http://0-search.proquest.com.wam.leeds.ac.uk/docview/870954745?accountid=14664

Soster, R., Monga, A., Bearden, W., & Debbie MacInnis served as editor and Gal Zauberman served as associate editor for this article. (2010). Tracking Costs of Time and Money: How Accounting Periods Affect Mental Accounting.Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 712-721. doi:1. Retrieved from http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.leeds.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/656388 doi:1

Spiller, Stephen A. 2010.―Constraints Drive Opportunity Cost Consideration.Working paper, dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Swan, J. E. and Richard L. Oliver. 1991. ―An Applied Analysis of Buyer Equity Perceptions and Satisfaction with Automobile Salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 11: 15-26.

Stacks, W. D. (2010). Primer of Public Relations Research. . Guilford Press.

Tata McGraw-Hill Education. (2013). Marketing Research. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

Thaler, Richard H. 1980.―Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. ‖ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39-60.

Thaler, R.H., 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral decision making12(3), p.183.

Thaler, R.H., 2008.Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science27(1), pp.15-25.

Tsiotsou, R. (2006, March). The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 207-217.

Willis, G. B. (2016). Questionnaire Pretesting. The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Zhou, R. and Pham, M.T., 2004. Promotion and Prevention across Mental Accounts: When Financial Products Dictate Consumers& Investment Goals. Journal of Consumer Research31(1), pp.125-135.

Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?