The rule, which prohibits children from getting organ transplant form adult, is fair. Adult organs do not grow with the child. They remain small in size the way the doctors transplant them even as the child grows in size leading to challenges of balance in body processes such as breathing. Donating an adult organ to a child, therefore, means that the child will have to undergo another transplant in the future, which is costly and life-threatening. Also, there is the issue of trimming the organ like a liver to fit the size of the body. This idea of cutting a live organ raises moral questions, which are not right according to society, and religious beliefs. Children should only get adult organs when there is no other source from another child. The case includes when no child is willing to donate, or there is no other child whose organ is compatible. In this case, the doctors will apply the principle of beneficent and Utilitarian. Doctors should also draw their line for general transplant in necessity. They should ensure that they do not reduce the happiness of one person as they increase for another through beneficent ethics. Also, doctors should avoid coercing donors or buying organs to encourage body exploitation.
Caplan, A. L. (2015). Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as a source of organs and tissues for transplantation. Replacement Parts: The Ethics of Procuring and Replacing Organs in Humans, 103.
Richards, I., & Bourgeois, M. (2014). Principles and practice of toxicology in public health (2nd ed., pp. 1-497). 5 Wall St - Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?
To view this post please activate subscription.