Software as a Service in the Security Solutions Market

Software as a Service in the Security Solutions Market

Problem Statement

In the provision of security solutions, F-Secure: Software as a Service, has a primary mission of protecting both businesses and consumers against computer insecurities and PC viruses. For Software as a Service, one of its significant benefits owes to its competence of easy access anywhere, just as long as there is the presence of internet connectivity. However, it still poses significant risks and issues now that the world is facing untimely spread of both smartphones and laptops. The main problem addresses cloud data that is easily accessible from strictly any device or location (Shelly et al., 2012). Worse of all, it includes access to people’s vital information at indiscreet endpoints. Without a practical system design proposal, most businesses risk losing crucial data to the wrong hands. If a company opts to implement the use of F-Secure: Software as a Service, then management should note that it couples up with the essence to implement selective regulations as a control measure for the connectivity.

Significance

The project proposal involves designing a system software to control the ease of access to cloud data from nearly any location or device by using F-Secure SaaS. Be it a group, a company or an individual, this problem is of great significance and requires immediate attention. Currently, it is the most comprehensive security package endpoint in the market. The SaaSforms the basis of offering solutions to challenging cybersecurity needs to various individuals, companies, and agencies (Kim& Solomon, 2016).

More so, the particular business necessarily does not require either a management overhead or countless maintenance. As it protects organizational and individual information at an averagely lower cost, it makes it a great significance to both the business and the person. F-Secure is beneficial to a company as it safeguards all the departmental computers, databases and several other devices against cyber threats, including data breaches and ransom-ware.

Objectives

The project has an extensive scope but narrows to the three primary goals that would ascertain the competency of implementing the software system design to a given business. The first objective of the proposal is to uphold the ongoing success of the company by giving it a competitive advantage against its rivals. The project, thus, has to identify selective fundamentals for the present strong position to thrive (Shelly et al., 2012). In trying to succeed, F-Secure recognizes ISPs as its primary partner towards providing security solutions.

The project also emphasizes the possible transitions that might occur in the coming next five years. For example, would F-Secure as a service tarnish to a supreme business model? The design also opts to establish new capabilities in the process. For instance, are there any competencies that the software might require to remain competitive for the business? And then, it seeks to determine whether there are any ideas on what first-hand business chances digital convergence might deliver to F – Secure.

Deliverables

In this proposal, a solution is essential to help in protecting crucial business information. Starting with the price, it is more of a straightforward model. Notably, it only guarantees for a maximum of 25 devices for protection. It offers a base subscription costof about 70 USD for 1-3 gadgets annually. To successfully run, considerations for various functionality features are vital. First, it should have a LISTSERV Classic/HPO that runs under Windows 2008/2012/2016 server.

Either, a present distribution of Linux could also act as a substitute (Kim& Solomon, 2016). Secondly, to permit for the AV scan aspect, an already paid Maintenance is necessary should the business have a perpetual Product Lak for LISTSERV. Lastly, before the installation, one must also seek a permit from the sales representative in exchange for FSAV key.

Methodology

The installation process recognizes the use of Prelink as a distribution tool. It helps in the reduction of startup stretch of binaries, even though it confronts the product’s integrity checker. First, it is essential to disable the Prelink by locating the configuration doc in the operating system and remove the line before the product’s installation. It follows with disabling the automatic links from cron. In some distributions, however, they run Prelink countless times to limit the double time. By conflicting the integrity checker, it makes it possible to detect any particular modifications that arise in the system (Paradkar, 2017). Before installing F–Secure Linux Security, it is essential to run /opt/f-secure/fav/bin/fsims after the command line to activate the installation mode of the software. After turning off the installation mode, the files in the system automatically save in the Integrity Checker baseline.

Risks

No matter how fulfilling a project can be, there must still underlie obvious and unforeseen dangers. The main problem addresses cloud data that is easily accessible from any device or location. For instance, in the installation process, a virus could be hidden within a document by a third party. It poses significant destruction to the system, leave alone spoiling the existing files’ integrity. Incompatibility is another risk suppose the business is dealing with many software at the same time. It enlightens the possibility of a single software conflicting with the new upgrade, and this leads to the present files becoming incompatible as a result of the concealed viruses or malware (Bucker, 2012). Of course, it is a hectic situation as it often calls for an adequate amount of time to find a remedy. Without an efficient system design proposal, most businesses risk losing crucial data to the wrong hands. As such, it is essential for every company should consider installing an F-Secure software as a safety measure towards protecting the businesses’ vital information.

 

References

Bücker, A. (2012). Endpoint security and compliance management design guide: Using IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager. Poughkeepsie, N.Y: IBM Corp., International Technical Support Organization.

Paradkar, S. (2017). Mastering Non-Functional Requirements. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

Kim, D., & Solomon, M. (2016). Fundamentals of information systems security.

Shelly, G. B., Vermaat, M., & Course Technology, Inc. (2012). Discovering computers 2012: Your interactive guide to the digital world. Boston, Mass: Course Technology/Cengage Learning.

Do you need an Original High Quality Academic Custom Essay?