From Lips, (2012) writing, “The Gender Gap: Challenging the Rationalizations. Perceived Equity, Discrimination, and the Limits of Human Capital Models,” the writer argues out ideas organized in sections that assist in ensuring the proper understanding of this bridge throughout the universe. The writer’s research and interpretation of the data collected are focused on the United States of America. However, through her research Lips, (2012), ensures the information on the gap between women and men was carried out in every country to acquire an excellent sample to work with. According to the writer, one of the crucial reasons as to why this research was carried out was to ensure a clear picture of the gaps ability to reflect reasonable and fair results of variation in work patterns among men and women. The paper displays how the impact of employment discrimination against women was also crucial to the whole context.

Lips, (2012) points out ways in which human capital approach is a cause through which some “explanatory variables are used to shrink the perceived size of the gap.” Through the article, it is evident when there are differing opinions on investments between men and women in the places of work is argued out as one of the leading causes of this gap.  That shows how the writer lacks belief in the notion that discrimination brings about the difference between these two sexes.

According to Lips, (2012) gender work patterns and behaviours appear to be the leading cause of discrimination. It, therefore, implies that it is clear neither outcomes nor investment can be used to describe the gap that is witnessed in this process correctly. Through this, the writer shows how human capital models play a significant role in ensuring that the proper understanding as the passage explains in depth the different sections of human capital model and measuring investments and the outcomes is brought about in detail. Recognition of limitation to this trait is essential in ensuring the concept is appropriately controlled. The willingness of both parties to take this approach is also explained in the context as well as thinking beyond this approach is said to help a lot in ensuring a proper understanding of the gap.

Considering the broad scope of the research done, I agree with the writer as she has provided enough information as well as supporting the ideas. The process is achieved by showing the different causes and effects of the gender gap. The profound knowledge and the broad scope of that the plans are brought out act as the main reason as to why I strongly support the author.

 
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?