The relationship between Victimization and Offending

The relationship between Victimization and Offending

Victimization and Offending

A victim is an individual who goes through first-hand or undermined physical, psychological, or financial suffering because of another person’s actions. Victimization is the process of singling somebody out for barbaric or crooked treatment. Offending refers to causing dissatisfactory or problems. Offending is related to an expanded danger of victimization, and being a victim is highly associated with the danger of offending. Offending is firmly identified with a later increase in victimization, yet in the more extended term to a fall that will, in general, counteract the previous ascent. Victimization is related to a later rise in offending in the long run.


The connection between victimization and offending likewise alluded to as the victim-offender overlap is broadly reported. Crime victims may not always end up as offenders; however, the majority of offenders have been victims (Kranenbarg, Holt & Gelder, 2017). Victimization can lead to adverse physical, mental, and social results in people and some may proceed to carry out their very own violations. This article traces hypothetical driving clarifications for the victim-offender overlap, aspects that impact victimization and offending, and proposals for specialists to address vicious victimization and avert consequent offending.

The Relationship between Victimization and Offending

As earlier mentioned, the majority of crime casualties don’t progress toward becoming offenders. However, most offenders have been unfortunate casualties. Even though the definite number of victim-offenders (guilty parties that have encountered victimization) is obscure, victimization is very pervasive in the all-inclusive community (Farrell, 2017). A survey conducted by the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) in the year 2016 uncovered that people living in the U.S. experienced 5.4 million rough victimizations. Children are more likely to be victimized than adults; 61 percent of the United States youth below the age of 17 have been through violence and victimization in the previous year, and 39 percent of youngsters and their parental figures revealed many immediate victimizations (Farrell & Zimmerman, 2017). A 2017 ICJIA research discovered a more significant percentage of people in Illinois had been victimized in their lifetimes.

Subjection to viciousness can incorporate direct relational victimization, compromised physical mischief, or the seeing or hearing of brutality. The victimization incident can lead to adverse physical, psychological, and conduct results in people and some may proceed to perpetrate crime (Farrell, 2017). This article centers around victimization that happens before offending; in any case, it is perceived that on the other hand, offending may prompt victimization. By assessing the occurrence of victim-offender overlap, specialists can learn approaches to deal with victimization before it happens to lessen offending and recidivism.

Why Some Victims Become Offenders

Researchers don’t concur on why a number of victim’s people are in danger of getting to be guilty parties. The issue is mind-boggling and differs by individual socioeconomics, exploitation types, and violations perpetrated.

Theoretical Framework: A number of speculations try to clarify the connection between victimization and offending (Farrell, 2017). All speculations include similar gatherings, and people experience the topics that offending is learned through victimization encounters and victimization together with offending. Several theories explain this.

The intergenerational transmission of violence theory: Likewise alluded to as the social learning hypothesis of aggression, the intergenerational transmission of violence theory asserts that violent conduct is inherited through social learning or a cycle of viciousness. Savagery is seen to be a compelling problem-solving method utilized when different alternatives have not been decidedly fortified.

Routine activities/lifestyle perspective theory: This theory suggests that an absence of supervision together with connections with eccentric friends permits or supports people to be involved in violence (Kranenbarg, Holt & Gelder, 2017). These factors pose a high risk of victimization to the individuals. The social disorganization theory correspondingly indicates the environment and companion groups lead to victimization which impacts offending.

Strain theory:  Strain hypothesis recommends offending is an adapting reaction to subjection to savagery or “strain.” related speculations incorporate social control theory, which hypothesizes that individuals take in offending conduct from their very own victimization encounters, and self-control theory, which suggests people overlook the potential pessimistic outcomes of their activities prompting culpability and victimization.

Research has tried several victim-offender overlap theories and established some dangers for victim-offenders:

Impeded decision-making: In an investigation of youth, before victimization impacted the decision in circumstances that brought about brutal offending.

Regular qualities and practices: Students who were casualties of physical attack and their offenders had resemblance—were bound to be male with a comparative way of life practices.

Gained from experiences: A meta-examination by Stith and partners uncovered a connection between going through childhood in an oppressive family and later participation in a fierce marriage. Victims took in brutality from their victimization encounters which affected their execution of savagery (Farrell & Zimmerman, 2017).


Factors Influencing Victimization and the Perpetration of Violence Offending

The social-biological model is a hypothetical system that looks at the intricate connection between societal, network, relationships, and individual factors that expose individuals in danger for victimization and additionally execution of violence/ offending. Each element envelops one of a kind encounters with violence while recognizing their impact on each other (Kranenbarg, Holt & Gelder, 2017). It is speculated that by tending to these elements, victimization can be decreased and, accordingly, ensuing offending by unfortunate casualties can be deflected or diminished.

Individual Level Factors: Individual Level factors that add to offending incorporate age, education level, revenue, and emotional well-being indicators. Fierce conduct originates from people’s psychosocial advancement, science (nervous system science, hormones, innate qualities), and social procedures. Majority of the youth pursue an anticipated trend of risk-taking with new natural achievements, as they are acquainted with further inducement (Farrell, 2017). Psychological well-being pointers, including drug addiction ailments, additionally are identified with an offending and compelling treatment of these states have been connected to decreased recidivism. Childhood abuse has been connected to an overactive pressure reaction and over time changes in brain functions that are associated with emotions (Farrell & Zimmerman, 2017).

Trauma and post-traumatic stress: Albeit more research are required, trauma seems to add to offending and victimization. Trauma can be brought about by victimization, and other life situations, for example, startling loss of a friend or family member and cataclysmic events. Post-traumatic stress issue (PTSD) is an emotional well-being diagnosis dependent on traumatic incidences bringing about indications that are steady and nosy and causing mental distress and changes in comprehensions, disposition, excitement, and reactivity.

PTSD and trauma origination have been observed to be emphatically connected with criminal justice inclusion, and high rates of mental illness have been discovered among criminal equity populaces. Existent exploration demonstrates trauma poses a danger of violent victimization through direct ways, for example, social learning, or potentially deviant ways, for example, substance abuse and emotional well-being issues (Kranenbarg, Holt & Gelder, 2017). People may respond in different ways to the equivalent awful experience, conveying differing dimensions of dread, outrage, blame, disgrace, and misery. Compelling intercession procedures ought to mirror this comprehension.

Relationship-level factors: Negative associations with friends and family, just as immediate victimization or perception of vicious conduct, can have a very huge impact. Youngsters’ conduct is formed to a great extent via parental figures and kin, yet in school-age years, children can be influenced by their peers. Victimization caused by bullying in school is a substantial hazard factor for offending in the future. Some study agrees that school-age youngsters who go through victimization desire to defend themselves by seeming courageous and robust and therefore engage in offending practices.

Unfavorable childhood experiences: Victimization at a young age is a more grounded indicator of offending than in other life stages. Young people are at risk of various sorts of offending at various ages (Farrell, 2017). For instance, encountering sibling brutality diminishes with age, yet encountering weapon offenses increment with age. For sure youngsters who go through various victimizations, there are pointers in brutal victimization before a certain age which generally are times of school transition.

Community-level factors: Community-level elements can support or restrict offending and can incorporate neighborhood qualities, for example, joblessness rates, populace density, and simplicity of transportation. Individuals in an area may feel separated from the justice framework and organize different gatherings that make them feel safe, for example, immoral or violent groups (Kranenbarg, Holt & Gelder, 2017). Encountering or seeing brutality in the community, can influence one’s feeling of security and rouse savage conduct. Some young people in underprivileged neighborhoods start offending conduct early and continue over time.

Strategies to Reduce Victimization and Offending

Singular dimension violence prevention procedures incorporate treatment, education, and abilities training. Psychological, social treatment indicates people the association between their encounters, dispositions, and practices, and outrage management and helps in enhancing solid adapting aptitudes and viable self-articulation (Farrell, 2017). Relationship-level techniques to balance negative impacts of companions and family incorporate child-rearing classes and family treatment, in which guardians are enlightened about positive/negative fortification, compromise, and modeling, and tutoring programs, which offer victimized people instances of sound connections. Moreover, viable anti-bullying programs in schools avoid future offending and such projects include a decent money cost-benefit proportion.


Victimization is, regrettably, very regular in our general public causing damage to people who, for mind-boggling and different reasons, may then proceed to carry out crime and even bad offenses (Farrell & Zimmerman, 2017). However, most people who experience vicious or traumatic events don’t engage in offending later on. Even though a connection between victimization and offending has been set up, the points of interest of the relationship are as yet not clear. Violence counteractive action techniques can be upgraded with research on the victim-offender overlap in people as well as in more significant societal gatherings and longitudinally. Also, the criminal equity framework ought to consider procedures to deliver issues identified with justice-involved people’s past trauma and victimization.



Kranenbarg, M. W., Holt, T. J., & Gelder, J. V. (2017). Offending and Victimization in the Digital Age: Comparing Correlates of Cybercrime and Traditional Offending-Only, Victimization-Only and the Victimization-Offending Overlap. Deviant Behavior, 40(1), 40-55. doi:10.1080/01639625.2017.1411030

Farrell, C., & Zimmerman, G. M. (2017). Does offending intensify as exposure to violence aggregates? Reconsidering the effects of repeat victimization, types of exposure to violence, and poly-victimization on property crime, violent offending, and substance use. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 25-33. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.09.004

Farrell, C. (2017). Exploring the Overlap Between Sexual Victimization and Offending Among Young Women Across Neighborhoods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 088626051668977. doi:10.1177/0886260516689778