The world is currently full of legislation and public policy; thus the question of whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested or not is exceedingly discordant and charged ardently. The two sides fight so hard for what they want, and the consequences are usually a big fight for the legal authority. Over time, laws that govern drug testing for welfare recipients are getting more famous. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, not less than 17 states in the United States were in progress of making laws governing drug testing as on May 2016. These laws have been said to be attempting to put down the less privileged class by being attacked on various grounds, ranging from the constitutional to the practical. This article, therefore, intends to show on main points from both perspectives rather than just giving a mere opinion on the said topic.
First, drug testing for welfare receivers could lead to the use of taxpayers money judiciously. For the few people that their taxes are used to fund the welfare system, they will feel very privileged to see their tax dollars being used to help other people on welfare to buy drugs. Therefore, advocates of mandatory drug testing argue that regular drug tests would ensure that the people on welfare would be using welfare money for reasonable things like food, housing, and other necessities instead of substances of abuse.
Second, it helps in identifying specific people who need help in substance abuse treatment. It is important to note that substance abuse is a problem that affects the whole society, not just the specific people who are abusing substances. Mandatory drug testing, therefore, helps in identifying these individuals who can benefit from substance abuse treatment so they can get help and at long last, they will save money that they could have used in substance abuse (Yocaubian, Peters, Urbach & Johnson, 2002).
Thirdly, there exist alternative methodologies. Even though drug testing of all applicants in wholesale may not save on costs, it is straightforward to amend the policies so that, for instance, the specific members who are highly suspected of drug abuse will be tested. Also, drug testing for welfare recipients sets a good precedent in the job market. There has always been an argument by the legislature members of a state that employers mostly need drug testing, thus it is also very reasonable to require drug testing for welfare recipients. Moreover, this method discourages the use of welfare for a long time. This is because the accumulation of more qualifications for protecting profits gives individuals hopes to find work and thus avoiding other paperwork needed to maintain welfare.
A more significant part of the public thinks about welfare recipients
Access the rest of the content in the post instantly by clicking the checkout button below. Thank you.